Protest AIPAC "National Summit" San Diego, Oct. 18

Below is the notice at the Activist San Diego Website. The National Summit is one of AIPAC's largest events, second only to the annual "Policy Conference" that takes place annually in Washington DC. If you or someone you know are in the San Diego Area, please join the protest.

PROTEST AIPAC's SUMMIT
with Al-Awda San Diego

Sunday, October 18, 2009
Time: 11:30am - 4:00pm
Location: La Costa Resort and Spa
Street: 2100 Costa Del Mar Road

Join San Diego community members,
activists, students, and social justice
movements to protest the AIPAC Summit to

TAKE BACK U.S. FOREIGN POLICY !

The U.S. is providing Israel with at least $7.0 million each day in military aid, and the US had already given Israel at least $2.55 billion ($2,500,000,000) in MILITARY aid for Fiscal Year 2009. And yet thousands or Americans are left JOBLESS and WITHOUT health care.

COME JOIN US AND PROTEST AIPAC'S SUMMIT!!!

Protest of Olmert, San Francisco, Oct. 22

On Thursday October 22, former Prime Minister Olmert will be in San Francisco, as a guest of the World Affairs Council. He will be in the St Francis Hotel, we will be gathered outside on Union Square. We want Israel and its leaders held accountable for their crimes against the people of Palestine and Lebanon.

We support the findings of the Goldstone Report, that detail the crimes committed by Israel during its war against the whole people of Gaza of last December/January, in "Operation Cast Lead". President Obama and most politicians have simply refused to take this report seriously, if not vocally rejecting it, or just ignoring it completely.

It is therefore up to us, civil society, to again do what politicians are just too afraid to do. Call for universal application of human rights and international law. This will be the message of our protest. We demand that Olmert, who initiated "Operation Cast Lead" and is directly responsible for the crimes that took place. Olmert is also responsible for the insane attack against Lebanon in the Summer of 2006. Olmert shares criminal responsibility for the siege on Gaza that leaves children hungry and 1.5 million people in desperate circumstances.

Please plan on being there. Please spread the word. We need to stand together to create a new reality. We will not accept that Israel may act with impunity and total disregard for human life. This protest is our opportunity to stand up and be counted.

AIPAC, the 752 lb Gorilla in the Room?

A commentary in Mother Jones by Robert Dreyfuss is well worth reading. It's basic premise is that AIPAC's power is fading, what was once the 800 lb, now is maybe the 400 lb Gorilla. He cites as evidence that Cong. Berman stopped a AIPAC resolution that tightens sanction on Iran from proceeding to a vote.

But this time, AIPAC was in for a surprise. Rep. Howard Berman, a dependable Israel backer who authored the legislation this past spring, put it on ice just weeks after it was introduced. "I have no intention of moving this bill through the legislative process in the near future," declared the California Democrat, who chairs the powerful House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
"Berman shocked everybody by not moving this bill forward," an official from the Israel lobby told me. "He's essentially put the kibosh on the bill. On his own bill! This is a major, major, major problem." ....
To be sure, it would be a mistake to count AIPAC out. It still has 100,000 members, a $60 million budget, and a $140 million endowment. Some 300 staffers, including an army of lobbyists, work out of 18 AIPAC offices spread across the country; they are tight with State Department and Pentagon bureaucrats, and can call on a vast network of political action committees, campaign contributors, and influentials. At its May conference—event slogan: "Relationships Matter"—AIPAC chose Lee Rosenberg, an Illinois businessman with close ties to Obama, as its next president. Its name notwithstanding, AIPAC is not a political action committee and does not contribute money directly to political campaigns. The Center for Responsive Politics, however, identifies 31 separate PACs as "pro-Israel" donors. And while independent of AIPAC, many of these organizations look to the mother ship for guidance on which candidates to support. During the 2008 election cycle, according to an analysis conducted for Mother Jones by the center, these 31 PACs and their individual donors funneled an eye-popping $22.5 million to various candidates.

Even more sobering is the fact that the bill mentioned above, the one Berman "put the kibosh on" is still very much alive. It was most likely delayed, not rejected. It now has 305 co-sponsors in the House. (out of 435 total members). The National Iranian American Council believes that during Berman's last trip to China:

(Berman) discussed his concerns about Iran’s nuclear program with Chinese leaders. Most likely, Berman is hoping to convince the Chinese to support another round of UN Security Council sanctions on Iran, modeled off of his bill, H.R. 2194, that seeks to impose a gasoline embargo on Iran.

Really, it seemed to be no more than a matter of timing. AIPAC and Berman are now on a synchronized beat. Just this last week, "National Jewish Leadership Advocacy Day on Iran." convened to push for a tougher line on Iran.

Speaking at the National Jewish Leadership Advocacy Day on Iran on Thursday in Washington, U.S. Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) said that next month he will mark up the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act and "begin the process of tightening the screws on Tehran" if Iran "does not reverse course."
The legislation would allow the sanctioning of companies that help Iran import or produce refined petroleum, which is seen as potentially having a large impact on Iran's economy because the country imports 40 percent of its refined petroleum.
Berman said that the clock has "almost run out" on Iran.

Seems that AIPAC is in pretty good form. At the same event, Dennis Ross (formerly of the aipac-related "think tank" WINEP, and now works in the White House) did not give any indication if the White House would support the passage of the Sanctions bill (so here, AIPAC may be running into some resistance- or not). AIPAC certainly seems to have Berman doing its bidding, from China to DC and next month in San Diego, where Berman is a guest speaker at the AIPAC "National Summit". Berman will be a guest speaker along with Victor Styrsky, West Coast director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI, Hagee's extremist cult) and Eliot Abrams, a convicted criminal from the Iran/Contra days (does it not seem even a little ironic to these people that Abrams was part of a criminal plot to sell weapons to Iran?), who, like CUFI, is opposed to any "Land for Peace" deal.

It is clear that the agenda of this political lobby still poses a threat. If Congress and the administration approach the issue of nuclear proliferation from the perspective "Israel can have nuclear weapons, in fact we will completely ignore its massive arsenal, but you can't enrich uranium for any reason.... and if you do you will be subject to military attack" rather than a rational approach of a universal application of international law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and common sense, then it will not be successful in preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that began when Israel introduced the inhuman weapons there more than 40 years ago. A rational approach would include a call for a nuclear-free Middle East, opposed by AIPAC. In fact, because of Israel's refusal to become part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, US aid to Israel violates the Symington Amendment passed by Congress in 1961. These double-standards undermine the goal of creating a safe, nuclear-free world.

Has AIPAC been reduced to half the gorilla it once was? In the last eight months, AIPAC pro-war/occupation events have been protested in five different cities. Last year, AIPAC lost a big fight when a resolution before congress regarding Iran was dropped after a popular outcry. This year, AIPAC is facing opposition among mainstream groups "pro-Israel" groups like J Street and Peace Now that are opposing the its anti-Iran sanctions bill, as well as an array of peace organizations like Peace Action (they have a "Can the Sanctions" campaign) and others. So AIPAC does seem a bit haggard and just a bit more battle-weary, just a tad more gaunt than we have seen it in a long while. Maybe it is now the 752 lb gorilla in the room. Getting more beleaguered by the day, but still very capable of causing major damage.

Protest of AIPAC in Minneapolis

About 40 peace activists demonstrated at the front and back doors to Temple Israel on Wednesday, Sept. 2, to protest the presentation of Ann Lewis, a former senior advisor to Bill and Hillary Clinton, that was sponsored by AIPAC.

The event was advertised by Temple Israel as a community program and dessert reception that was open to the public, but attendees were asked to RSVP to AIPAC. They denied access to Coalition for Palestinian Rights members Sarah Martin and Karen Redleaf and to Colleen Rowley, former FBI whistleblower and congressional candidate and current member of Women Against Military Madness.

Sarah Martin explained: “AIPAC wants people to support the close relationship between the U. S. and Israel unconditionally. But they know that Israel is illegally occupying the West Bank and Gaza and perpetrating numerous injustices against Palestinians. They’re afraid of the public finding out how our tax dollars are being used to fund Israeli war crimes, and they’re trying to hide from the criticism they deserve. The bombing of Gaza that killed 1,400 civilians early this year is just one of the many atrocities being carried out by the Israeli government.”

Colleen Rowley said, “All we want is a free and open discussion of the Israeli and Palestinian problem.”
Read more here. 

On August 12th Obama will Not Honor AIPAC.

AIPAC and its allies are getting hysterical. On August 12th President Obama will award the Presidential Medal of Honor to Mary Robinson, the former President of Ireland along with 15 other people. Robinson also served as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. In that capacity, she was critical of Israeli policies. In a statement released earlier this week, AIPAC wants President Obama to "firmly, fully and publicly repudiate her views on Israel and her long public record of hostility and one-sided bias against the Jewish state". It has not done so, only saying that she may have said things they did not agree with, as probably many of the other recipeints, and will go ahead to award her this honor.

Leading this fight in Congress is Shelly Berkley of Nevada. Berkeley, a Democrat, was recently a a speaker at the extremist CUFI, an outfit founded by religious cultist John Hagee.

Its difficult to understand why AIPAC has chosen this battle. It seems that they made the calculation that it would be helpful in the long-run to lose this battle, but they may see it as a way to discredit Obama, as he continues to insist that Israel freeze the growth of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. A battle that Obama continues to wage, though appears that he is losing. This last week saw the forced eviction of Palestinian residents in East Jerusalem, a move that Obama had specifically opposed.

Leave No Politician Behind. Not even the Greens.

The Green Party USA supports Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions of Israel.

The Green Party of the United States (GPUS) publicly calls for divestment from and boycott of the State of Israel until such time as the full individual and collective rights of the Palestinian people are realized.

So why does an elected official in San Francisco, who ran on a platform that very explicitly opposed militarism, decide to accept funding for a trip sponsored by a extremist pro-war organization to visit Israel? We would very much like to know.

The following is an open letter to Jane Kim of the San Francisco Board of Education. Last year, she participated in a delegation put together by a group called "American-Israel Friendship League", a groups that right now is focusing on making sure that Israel is not held accountable for the war crimes it committed in Gaza.

We are hoping that this open letter gets a positive response, and that Ms. Kim will be open to meeting with Palestinian youth, so they can share firsthand the barriers Israel has constructed to prevent a decent education for them. So if you live in San Francisco, please also consider sharing your concerns in a respectful manner.


Jane Kim
San Francisco Board of Education

Ms. Kim,

I have just learned, more than a year after the fact, that you participated in a trip paid for by a political lobby supporting Israeli policies. It is disturbing that you have accepted funding for travel from an organization that has a platform that contradicts progressive values of support for human rights and peace.

This very same organization, "American Israel Friendship League" is leading the call to exempt Israel from being held accountable for violations of international law with its barbaric bombing and destruction of Gaza. Crimes that include the killing of hundreds of children (students) by US supplied weapons. Crimes that include the withholding of aid that will provide nourishment for children, who are instead suffering malnutrition and in the grip of a man-made humanitarian catastrophe with policies supported by the very same organization that paid for your trip to Israel.

I appreciate that you want to learn more of what is happening in the Middle East. I hope in the future you choose not to accept any funding from groups that oppose human rights, from groups that support the waging of war against civilians that destroys the basics of society. I hope you can very soon take the time to listen to Palestinian voices and their experiences of how the Israeli system of occupation and apartheid have denied so many Palestinian young people of their right to education. That can be done by listening to local voices here in the Bay Area or by another trip to the Middle East. May I suggest you consider joining a delegation to Palestine guided by the Middle East Children's Alliance? You may learn more of that delegation here: http://mecaforpeace.org/article.php?list=type&type=52

We need more than ever political leaders unafraid to speak up for human rights, justice and peace. I appreciate your courage to stand against the ROTC and military recruitment in our schools. Please stand firmly for the rights of Palestinians to education and a decent future.

For peace,

Jim Harris
people@stopaipac.org
www.StopAIPAC.org

Stop AIPAC
PO Box 11311
Berkeley, CA 94712

References:
"Local Progressives Step Beyond Normal Boundaries"

American Israel Friendship League

Inside an AIPAC Event- a report from Portland, OR

Want to call your attention to Peter Miller's article about the actual content of an aipac event, repeated in dozens of cities each year. This event took place at the end of March 2009.

Peter reports on how what was said:

In his talk, Peter Beinart, an editor at the New Republic, gave the framework for AIPAC’s work in the coming months: dealing with the threat of Iran. He portrayed Obama and Netanyahu as two characters in a movie who, though they dislike each other intensely, are thrown together on a quest to “get the bad guy,” meaning Iran. In perhaps the most frightening statement of the evening, Beinart remarked that Netanyahu’s main purpose will be to do everything he can “to prepare for the day when he goes to the oval office and tells Obama that Israel has to take military action against Iran.”
As for the Israel-Palestine issue, Beinart predicts a fake U.S. peace effort in order to garner support for tough sanctions against Iran. His statement is worth quoting at length:
“I think that the Administration’s view toward the Palestinian situation is mostly going to be to try and keep it quiet…[When Obama works with the Sunni Arab countries or Europe, he will hear] ‘What we need you [Obama] to do as the price for being able to get another round of sanctions is at least the perception of movement on the Israeli-Palestinian problem, we need there to be some Israeli-Palestinian process, even though we are realists [and] we don’t believe it will get anywhere.’…And so the Obama Administration thinks they need to be actively engaged in the Israel-Palestinian peace process--not necessarily because they believe they can pull off a final settlement--but because they need it in the coalition against Iran, and because they need to prevent things in the Palestinian Territories from actually getting worse.”

Note that “preventing things from getting worse” does not mean improving the humanitarian or human rights situation in the Palestinian occupied territories; it does not mean stopping settlement construction or home demolition; it does not mean negotiating in good faith with Fatah and Abbas. It is all about taking actions against Hamas and creating the mere perception of a peace process. In downplaying the right wing turn of Israel’s government, AIPAC and others also ignore the real danger to peace posed by Israel’s new foreign minister, the racist Avigdor Lieberman who openly advocates ethnic cleansing. J Street, a new Jewish lobby organization created as an alternative to AIPAC, stated that Lieberman’s views were “contrary to both our democratic and our Jewish values.” - From AIPAC: The Anti-Peace Lobby

Great thanks to Peter and the Portland group for protesting this event, and for sharing the story of the aipac agenda. Be sure to read the whole thing.

75% in House sign onto AIPAC letter supporting Israeli-guided "peace process"

At the AIPAC Policy Conference, the Lobby pushed two initiatives, one about US and Iran, and another about the "peace process". The letter from AIPAC, introduced by Rep. Hoyer and Eric Cantor, used terms like "our mutual desire for peace" it contained a subtle warning to Obama: Don't pressure Israel. "The proven best way forward is to work closely and privately together both on areas of agreement and especially on areas of disagreement".

President Obama has been saying that his administration is opposed to any increase in Israeli Settlements in the West Bank. Netanyahu insists that they be allowed "natural growth" of existing settlements. Where does congress stand on this dispute? Clearly on the side of AIPAC/Netanyahu, in that they signaled they want no public pressure on Israel to work for peace.

Who signed this letter? Go here to see the House members so far. Here for the US Senate.

AIPAC-related "Think-Tank" Suggests Military attacks on Media

The Journal of International Security Affairs is the publication of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) JINSA is part of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. All of the members of the Conference sit on AIPAC's Executive Committee.JINSA is among many of the many extreme organizations that are part of that coalition. How extreme? Let's see what one of the contributers to the publication suggested for media that does not tow the military-line in any conflict.

Today, the United States and its allies will never face a lone enemy on the battlefield. There will always be a hostile third party in the fight, but one which we not only refrain from attacking but are hesitant to annoy: the media.

...It seems unthinkable now, future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media. From Wishful Thinking and Indecisive Wars

Sound just like tough talk to you? Let's remember that in the early days of the war on Iraq, the Bush administration reportedly considered targeting Al Jeezera in Qatar. Or the many journalists killed in Palestine, including journalist James Miller. Just weeks ago, Amira Hass, a prominent Israeli journalist was arrested for committing actually doing her job. This is more than talk. And it is coming from the Israel Lobby. No limits to war.

"Strange Jane" Harman has to take it all back

The Persian population in Iran is not a majority, it is a plurality. There are many different, diverse, and disagreeing populations inside Iran and an obvious strategy, which I believe is a good strategy, is to separate those populations. - Jane Harman, AIPAC Policy Conference, 2009

This statement by Jane Harman was alarming, the National Iranian American Council put out an alert, asking people to reject Harman's idea that Iran be split along ethnic lines. Jane then retracted her statement.

“I was not and am not calling for the creation of ethnic tensions or separation in Iran – nothing would be less productive,” said Harman in a statement to NIAC. “Although my comments on Iran were taken out of context, I regret any concern they might have caused.”

Taken out of context? We don't think so. But it was good to see that Jane did the right thing, after organized pressure.

AIPAC's choice of extremist speakers never ceases to amaze us.

Who Will Stop AIPAC Before it is Too Late?

Medea Benjamin of Code Pink and co-founder of Global Exchange asks our question- Who will Stop AIPAC? The answer - We Will. We, the people, we the peace organizations, we, the human rights groups, we the Palestine solidarity groups, we the supporters of Israeli dissidents, We will stop this Lobby for War and Occupation.

- While I was being tackled by security guards at Washington's Convention Center during the AIPAC conference for unfurling a banner that asked "What about Gaza?," my heart was aching. I wasn't bothered so much by the burly guards who were yanking my arms behind by back and dragging me-along with 5 other CODEPINK members-out of the hall. They were doing their job.

What made my heart ache was the hatred I felt from the AIPAC staff who tore up the banner and slammed their hands across my mouth as I tried to yell out: "What about Gaza? What about the children?"

"Shut the f--- up. Shut the f--- up." one staffer yelled, red-faced and sweating as he ran beside me. "This is not the place to be saying that shit. Get the f--- out of here."

What makes my heart ache is thinking about the traumatized children I met on my recent trip to Gaza, and how their suffering is denied by the 6,000 AIPAC conventioneers who are living in a bubble-a bubble where Israel is the victim and all critics are anti-Semitic, terrorist lovers or, as in my case, self-hating Jews.

I found it fascinating that AIPAC's executive director Howard Kohr opened the conference admitting that there was now a huge, international campaign against the policies of Israel. He painted a picture of 30,000 people marching in Spain, Italian trade unionists calling for a boycott of Israeli products, the UN Human Rights Council passing 26 resolutions condemning Israel, an Israeli Apartheid Week that is building a global boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign....

More here.

Protest at AIPAC Policy Conference

Members of the peace group CODEPINK disrupted Israeli President Shimon Peres' speech Monday at the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee policy conference in Washington. Members of the group raised banners Want Peace? End the Occupation," What About Gaza?" and No Money for War Crimes."

The Stop AIPAC Blog.

Because there are so many things are happening so quickly, a blog is the best way to keep folks posted on the these developments. We will tell you about how AIPAC is working to assert its agenda for war and occupation, and how we and others are working to counter that agenda through protest and organized campaigns.

AIPAC and its related organizations exercise much influence in how US policy in the Middle East is shaped. The budget for AIPAC itself is over $60 million, with over 100,000 members. However, there is no reason we can't defeat those who call for more war, more human rights violations, more injustice. Peace and human rights and Palestine solidarity organizations throughout this country are changing the game in Washington. We are part of that.

Watch it happen here.